Jump to content


Photo

Suggestions for the setti 1 and dust2 only server


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 TeeHee

TeeHee

    Regular

  • Members
  • 89 posts
43

Posted 01 October 2011 - 07:18 AM

I think it would be better for the gameplay of those servers if you restrict awp to like 2-3 maybe 4 per team.
In the end it gets rediculous when one team is dominating and has like 10 awps, the other team barely has a chance anymore depending on the map. You can just hold it so easy with 2 awps covering any passage to a bombsite.

Also, restrict buytime, now atleast on d2 its super easy if u rush short for them to just buy nades from ct spawn and spam them to short. 15-20 seconds should be enough to buy everything you need, even for new players.

Thoughts?
Posted Image

Posted Image

#2 k1ller

k1ller

    Admin

  • Moderators - Admin
  • 4,250 posts
457

Posted 01 October 2011 - 07:38 AM

I think it would be better for the gameplay of those servers if you restrict awp to like 2-3 maybe 4 per team.
In the end it gets rediculous when one team is dominating and has like 10 awps, the other team barely has a chance anymore depending on the map. You can just hold it so easy with 2 awps covering any passage to a bombsite.

It's stupid to artificially restrict something like holding a weapon if someone else is already holding a similar weapon. In my opinion it's more annoying to see that "AWP restricted, you can't get it" than feel bad about being in the losing team.

Also, restrict buytime, now atleast on d2 its super easy if u rush short for them to just buy nades from ct spawn and spam them to short. 15-20 seconds should be enough to buy everything you need, even for new players.

What if you are missing just few bucks from the weapon you want? You could go kill someone, get back to spawn and buy the weapon you've always wanted. You can't do that if the buytime is limited.

More important is the ability to buy defusal kit at any point in the game. Also buying more nades and flashes is a good bonus.

Spamming short A is really not a problem.
Posted Image

#3 Al1

Al1

    Pro

  • Moderators - CS admin
  • 700 posts
310

Posted 01 October 2011 - 11:12 AM


I think it would be better for the gameplay of those servers if you restrict awp to like 2-3 maybe 4 per team.
In the end it gets rediculous when one team is dominating and has like 10 awps, the other team barely has a chance anymore depending on the map. You can just hold it so easy with 2 awps covering any passage to a bombsite.

It's stupid to artificially restrict something like holding a weapon if someone else is already holding a similar weapon. In my opinion it's more annoying to see that "AWP restricted, you can't get it" than feel bad about being in the losing team.

Also, restrict buytime, now atleast on d2 its super easy if u rush short for them to just buy nades from ct spawn and spam them to short. 15-20 seconds should be enough to buy everything you need, even for new players.

What if you are missing just few bucks from the weapon you want? You could go kill someone, get back to spawn and buy the weapon you've always wanted. You can't do that if the buytime is limited.

More important is the ability to buy defusal kit at any point in the game. Also buying more nades and flashes is a good bonus.

Spamming short A is really not a problem.

That`s true :D

#4 Selena

Selena

    No Nonsense Taker

  • Moderators - Minecraft admin
  • 702 posts
193
  • LocationSetti 3's Kindergarten

Posted 01 October 2011 - 01:00 PM

I think it would be better for the gameplay of those servers if you restrict awp to like 2-3 maybe 4 per team.
In the end it gets rediculous when one team is dominating and has like 10 awps, the other team barely has a chance anymore depending on the map. You can just hold it so easy with 2 awps covering any passage to a bombsite.

Also, restrict buytime, now atleast on d2 its super easy if u rush short for them to just buy nades from ct spawn and spam them to short. 15-20 seconds should be enough to buy everything you need, even for new players.

Thoughts?


Ever considered playing on the No-AWP server? I heard a rumor that there are no awp's there :icon_surprised:

#5 TeeHee

TeeHee

    Regular

  • Members
  • 89 posts
43

Posted 01 October 2011 - 01:54 PM


I think it would be better for the gameplay of those servers if you restrict awp to like 2-3 maybe 4 per team.
In the end it gets rediculous when one team is dominating and has like 10 awps, the other team barely has a chance anymore depending on the map. You can just hold it so easy with 2 awps covering any passage to a bombsite.

Also, restrict buytime, now atleast on d2 its super easy if u rush short for them to just buy nades from ct spawn and spam them to short. 15-20 seconds should be enough to buy everything you need, even for new players.

Thoughts?


Ever considered playing on the No-AWP server? I heard a rumor that there are no awp's there :icon_surprised:


I do play there, but I also like playing with awps and against them. Just too much of something nice is too much sometimes ;)
Posted Image

Posted Image

#6 el greco

el greco

    Pro

  • Moderators - CS admin
  • 320 posts
173
  • LocationPERU

Posted 02 October 2011 - 04:35 PM

can we remove the useless vote in the pub 3 plz? unless it has a purpose to vote yes or nothing... :whistling:
Caer estα permitido, levantarse es obligatorio

#7 k1ller

k1ller

    Admin

  • Moderators - Admin
  • 4,250 posts
457

Posted 02 October 2011 - 07:29 PM

can we remove the useless vote in the pub 3 plz? unless it has a purpose to vote yes or nothing... :whistling:

Thanks for reminding. Voting should be disabled now - the change takes effect after a map change.
Posted Image

#8 Mentiroso

Mentiroso

    Master

  • Moderators - CS admin
  • 1,048 posts
409

Posted 03 October 2011 - 12:57 PM

k1ller: actually the voting is still on!

#9 k1ller

k1ller

    Admin

  • Moderators - Admin
  • 4,250 posts
457

Posted 03 October 2011 - 01:46 PM

Let me know if it's still on. The servers share some config files so that's why voting might have been enabled even though it was set to be disabled.
Posted Image

#10 Mentiroso

Mentiroso

    Master

  • Moderators - CS admin
  • 1,048 posts
409

Posted 03 October 2011 - 02:51 PM

i left the server, slo-mamut muted me cause i was using mic to say where enemy was going, so i left. someone will reply though, there were a lot of people playing

#11 el greco

el greco

    Pro

  • Moderators - CS admin
  • 320 posts
173
  • LocationPERU

Posted 03 October 2011 - 03:05 PM

i left the server, slo-mamut muted me cause i was using mic to say where enemy was going, so i left. someone will reply though, there were a lot of people playing

yes vote is still on :icon_surprised: btw unmute menti he was only trying to help in game
Caer estα permitido, levantarse es obligatorio

#12 SyrinXeno

SyrinXeno

    Setti's "cheating" regular

  • Moderators - CS admin
  • 596 posts
202
  • LocationRight behind you with a knife ;)

Posted 27 October 2011 - 01:38 PM

Voting on Pub#3 is still enabled.

#13 Milky Pie

Milky Pie

    Pro

  • Members
  • 575 posts
166
  • LocationEstonia

Posted 27 October 2011 - 10:33 PM

I agree with teehee

#14 tagcollector

tagcollector

    One of us

  • Members
  • 128 posts
34

Posted 27 October 2011 - 11:41 PM

Teehee just join the loosin team..




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users