Jump to content


Photo

Banned? why?


  • Please log in to reply
49 replies to this topic

#41 SNiPY

SNiPY

    //Aggressive Gaming™

  • Moderators - Admin
  • 3,477 posts
577
  • LocationGreece

Posted 30 December 2012 - 12:42 AM

Hahahahahahahah  :lol: 


...you can achieve immortality, simply by doing one great thing...


#42 Ellanios

Ellanios

    Hole Stretcher

  • Moderators - CS admin
  • 640 posts
540
  • LocationPantheon of the Hole Stretchers

Posted 30 December 2012 - 03:27 PM

Why are you guys laughing?

Thanks to our constructive argument, the level of intellectuality in this forum is skyrocketed.

This is an answer to those saying that Setti is full of idiots.

 

--------------------------

 

On/Off-topic: I assume what you're trying to point out is that according to Michael Zmigrodski (?!) India comes first at his chronological order, right?

 

Is he a reliable source?

 

Because, what I quoted was from a respected archeologist which has been termed as the "America's first art historian".

Who's William Henry Goodyear: http://www.dictionar...g/goodyearw.htm

 

In contrast, except from an article which his name is mentioned in 3 paragraphs on some irrelevant to the topic website, I couldn't find something tangible proving that Zmigrodski a reliable source.

 

 

Here's a sample of the references at the end of the book.

 

Spoiler

 

 

As a matter of fact, a significant portion (about 1/3) of this book has references from Goodyear.

On the full book version the references section is about 13 pages long. 3-4 pages are full of Goodyear's references.

 

 

On the other hand, I couldn't find a single reference about Michael Zmigrodski even though his name was mentioned at least twice in this book. Proving that, Zmigrodski's reference on the book wasn't official, hence, he's not a reliable source concerning swastika facts.

 

So, I put my money on Goodyear. ;)

 

 

Anyways, I don't stand my ground based just from one book. I have read tons of different other reliable sources, which pointing to the Greek origin of swastika. I just referenced to this book because I think this has the most scientific approach. But, this is not the right place (and time) for such a discussion.

 

Verdict: Goodyear>Zmigrodski

 

 

I rest my case.



#43 Funky

Funky

    80's D.I.S.C.O.

  • Members
  • 345 posts
137
  • LocationReal Macedonia,Greece

Posted 30 December 2012 - 05:42 PM

Why are you guys laughing?

Thanks to our constructive argument, the level of intellectuality in this forum is skyrocketed.

This is an answer to those saying that Setti is full of idiots.

 

--------------------------

 

On/Off-topic: I assume what you're trying to point out is that according to Michael Zmigrodski (?!) India comes first at his chronological order, right?

 

Is he a reliable source?

 

Because, what I quoted was from a respected archeologist which has been termed as the "America's first art historian".

Who's William Henry Goodyear: http://www.dictionar...g/goodyearw.htm

 

In contrast, except from an article which his name is mentioned in 3 paragraphs on some irrelevant to the topic website, I couldn't find something tangible proving that Zmigrodski a reliable source.

 

 

Here's a sample of the references at the end of the book.

 

Spoiler

 

 

As a matter of fact, a significant portion (about 1/3) of this book has references from Goodyear.

On the full book version the references section is about 13 pages long. 3-4 pages are full of Goodyear's references.

 

 

On the other hand, I couldn't find a single reference about Michael Zmigrodski even though his name was mentioned at least twice in this book. Proving that, Zmigrodski's reference on the book wasn't official, hence, he's not a reliable source concerning swastika facts.

 

So, I put my money on Goodyear. ;)

 

 

Anyways, I don't stand my ground based just from one book. I have read tons of different other reliable sources, which pointing to the Greek origin of swastika. I just referenced to this book because I think this has the most scientific approach. But, this is not the right place (and time) for such a discussion.

 

Verdict: Goodyear>Zmigrodski

 

 

I rest my case.

Pwoned.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pwoned hard!


Don't get confused between my personality and my attitude.My personality is who i am,my attitude depends on who you are.

#44 P_W_S Marcello

P_W_S Marcello

    Setti Housetroll

  • Members
  • 662 posts
313
  • LocationLol i dunno, never left my room

Posted 30 December 2012 - 07:55 PM

Well ur statement looks quite grounded. But on the other hand i have to say, that i dont give a fuck about scientifical researches and Wikipedia says Inida. OWNED



#45 Heady

Heady

    Member

  • Moderators - Admin
  • 2,162 posts
913

Posted 02 January 2013 - 09:10 PM

Well ur statement looks quite grounded. But on the other hand i have to say, that i dont give a fuck about scientifical researches and Wikipedia says Inida. OWNED

What if I edit Wikipedia and say that Hitler or Merkel invented the 卐 sign? :trollface:



#46 P_W_S Marcello

P_W_S Marcello

    Setti Housetroll

  • Members
  • 662 posts
313
  • LocationLol i dunno, never left my room

Posted 02 January 2013 - 09:29 PM

Well, then Hitler wouldve founded the swastika



#47 mOE

mOE

    Expert

  • Members
  • 201 posts
113

Posted 02 January 2013 - 11:06 PM

actually u are all wrong... this is an egyptian symbol , the greeks copied it from egypt when alexander the great conquered egypt .

 

 

The swastika is an ancient symbol that has been used for over 3,000 years. (That even predates the ancient Egyptian symbol, the Ankh!)

 

 

here is the source

 

http://history1900s....tikahistory.htm


Posted Image

#48 mOE

mOE

    Expert

  • Members
  • 201 posts
113

Posted 02 January 2013 - 11:20 PM

another source

 

http://www.stewartsy...om/swastika.htm

 

this indicates that this is egyptian symbol but the indians are the one who gave it the name "swastika"


Posted Image

#49 Ghost

Ghost

    Admin

  • Moderators - Admin
  • 3,638 posts
274

Posted 03 January 2013 - 10:17 PM

It's OK if there are people presenting their beliefs on the server. Everybody should see it approriate to have somewhat mysterious nicknames on the server. For example http://css.setti.inf...e-3#entry82111. It's way of life which may or may not represent pre-21st century. You're all in the internet, right?

 

Admins ban players who are too stupid, though.

 

PS. Nazi flag is tilted 45 degrees. You can tell the difference by comparing it with http://fi.wikipedia..../Lentosotakoulu the stuff that you find from the internets. Seeing flags of any kind shouldn't be too much to handle for anyone in 2010's internet.



#50 SNiPY

SNiPY

    //Aggressive Gaming™

  • Moderators - Admin
  • 3,477 posts
577
  • LocationGreece

Posted 04 January 2013 - 04:38 PM

It's OK if there are people presenting their beliefs on the server. Everybody should see it approriate to have somewhat mysterious nicknames on the server.

 

+1


...you can achieve immortality, simply by doing one great thing...





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users