Jump to content


Photo

CRT vs. LCD input lag comparison


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 k1ller

k1ller

    Admin

  • Moderators - Admin
  • 4,250 posts
457

Posted 22 August 2009 - 07:38 PM

I made a video showing the clearly visible input lag in Samsung SyncMaster 245T.

http://css.setti.info/download/k1ller/i ... r-245t.avi

Not the best quality due to recording conditions.
Posted Image

#2 NekiNeznanec_

NekiNeznanec_

    Regular

  • Guests
  • 80 posts
0

Posted 22 August 2009 - 08:22 PM

CRT's rule :)

#3 Sculder_

Sculder_

    One of us

  • Guests
  • 116 posts
1

Posted 22 August 2009 - 09:49 PM

Then get Samsung SyncMaster 2233rz. CRT's rule in production of ICBM's. Very good for warheads.

#4 Guest_

Guest_
  • Guests

Posted 23 August 2009 - 01:14 AM

No LCD will beat CRT's performances nor will have better picture quality.
Input lag for CRT's is 0 or somewhere near 0 when LCD's have at least 5ms, and the bigger they are the slower they are.
Contrast - again CRT wins.

Each have pros and cons but consumer decides for himself anyway.

#5 Guest_

Guest_
  • Guests

Posted 23 August 2009 - 02:09 PM

bad thing for crt is that they are too BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIG
and that is really important to me atleast

#6 NekiNeznanec_

NekiNeznanec_

    Regular

  • Guests
  • 80 posts
0

Posted 23 August 2009 - 02:38 PM

They can't shrink.. but you can ;)

#7 Guest_

Guest_
  • Guests

Posted 23 August 2009 - 05:24 PM

You can test input lag with this: http://tft.vanity.dk/inputlag.html

I haven't got my screens to work in clone mode, so I can't test mine.
Also I've got 2 lcd monitors, so the result would just show the difference between
their input lags, not the amount of input lag.

#8 k1ller

k1ller

    Admin

  • Moderators - Admin
  • 4,250 posts
457

Posted 23 August 2009 - 08:23 PM

Delay between CRT and Samsung SyncMaster 245T: 47 ms

That about doubles my latency.
Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users